6 Denominations in 6 weeks

I'm in college ministry. Which, among other things, means that I occassionally read "Relevant" magazine (although, such a ridiculous name almost prevents my reading it) because the Wesley Ministry has a subscription. Not too long ago I ran across this interesting article: 6 Denominations in 6 weeks. The author, himself a Southern Baptist, visited 6 new churches and kept a journal of his reflections. It's a great story that can spur some good thinking.

I have a couple of reactions: his experience at The United Methodist Church seems a bit un-remarkable (although his description of the Presbyterian Church might be closer to what some larger Methodist Churches are like). His contrast between the Episcopal Church (week 5) and the Assembly of God Church (week 6) is really telling. Lots of folks have been talking about how different this generation is from our parents who invented the 'seeker service.' I think this is another example.

Go read it and tell me what do ya'll think?

Lambeth Conference begins

Every 10 years or so, all of the Anglican bishops from around the world gather in England, at Canterbury, the historic seat of the Archbishops of Canterbury for almost 1500 years, for the Lambeth Conference (named for the original meeting place at Lambeth Palace in London).

The Conference begins today and promises to be, one way or the other, one of the most significant Lambeth Conferences in the whole history of the Anglican Communion. Many believe that the crisis in the common life of the Communion has reached such a point that only the Lambeth Conference can decisively address the issues and set a way forward - and that it must do so if Anglicanism is to survive as a coherent movement. Many have also pointed to the structuring of the schedule at Lambeth and complained that it seems decisive action has been ruled out in advance. This is one (but not the only one) reason that around 200 of the over 800 Anglican bishops have boycotted the conference.

I fear that these boycotts themselves may prevent the Conference from having either the will or the moral authority necessary to address the crisis in the Anglican Communion in a decisive way. The picture on the left, I think, powerfully illustrates what is going on in this crisis. There will be no final compromise; all parties within the church simply CANNOT be appeased since what they desire are complete opposites. Indeed there are two opposite approaches to same-sex attraction - and each is held by its proponents to be fundamental to Christian morality and practice. The Church must decide where she stands. Or, I'm afraid, she will fall. I know that might sound a bit dramatic, but in my estimation (and more significantly, that of a huge number of Anglicans on both 'sides' of the current debates) that is the point to which Anglicanism has come.

Some even fear that this could, in effect, be the last Lambeth Conference if it should not act for the preservation of the Anglican Communion. An open letter to the bishops over at the Covenant Blog highlights many of the hopes and fears associated with this Lambeth from all sides.

I love this bit from the end of that letter:

"The grave concern that many of us have is that your conference will come and go without any of these matters being dealt with straightforwardly and positively. We know that there are many among you even who do not believe that your conference should be dealing with such matters, and would like the format of your meeting to exclude any decisions.

I cannot say what formal means are open to you. But I can say this: you are bishops of this church, you are gathering in the great name of Jesus Christ, and you are called to be faithful stewards of the mysteries entrusted to you (1 Cor. 4;1). "

You can follow the Conference at http://www.lambethconference.org/

Almighty and everlasting Father, you have given the Holy Spirit to abide with us forever: Bless, we pray, with his grace and presence the bishops and others now assembled in your Name, that your Church, being preserved in true faith and godly discipline, may fulfill all the mind of him who loved it and gave himself for it, your Son Jesus Christ our Savior; who lives and reigns with you, in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen.

-from The Book of Common Prayer, 1979, p. 255

Elections for bishops

It is one of the strange (and perhaps unholy) side-effects of our modeling much of our Church's organization on the US government, that our bishops must, in effect, 'run for office.' Of course, the election of episcopal oversight by the clergy or even the laity has precedents in the ancient Church, which no-doubt also saw its share of election campaigning.

Starting today, the 13th, the Jurisdictions of the United Methodist Church shall begin their meetings at which they will elect new bishops to replace a few retiring bishops. You can follow along here.

I've heard that the last crop of bishops, elected in 04 (we share the same election year as the government as well) really brought a fresh attitude and "shook up" the Council of Bishops somewhat, whose overall leadership and oversight is invaluable to the church. My hope and prayer is that God, by the strange working of the Spirit - even in spite of our democratic processes - should bring to that honored office individuals committed to renewing the theological integrity and unity of the church, and to starting new congregations and reaching those who do not yet believe in Christ as Lord and Savior. And that our new bishops will continue the good work of actively embodying the Kingdom in various ways - especially in continuing our work among the poor and the sick.

Almighty God, giver of every good gift: Look graciously on your Church, and so guide the minds of those who shall choose bishops for the Church, that we may recieve faithful pastors, who will care for your people and equip us for our ministries; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

-From The Book of Common Prayer, 1979, p. 818

On Spiritual Deliverance (Exorcism)

There are two equal and opposite errors into which our race can fall about the devils. One is to disbelieve in their existence. The other is to believe, and to feel an exessive and unhealthy interest in them. They themselves are equally pleased by both errors and hail a materialist or a magician with the same delight.

-C.S. Lewis (Preface to The Screwtape Letters)

When I was in seminary at SMU, I was asked in my Word and Worship Class (we studied liturgy) to prepare two liturgies for my final paper, with a running commentary on each. I thought it would be fun to do something different that would stir the biblical imagination of my professor, so I prepared a liturgy for performing an exorcism. That might sound absurd "this day and age" but (no doubt, partly due to the Pentecostal/Charismatic influences in my own faith journey) I felt then, and still do, that the topic of Spiritual Warfare in general and of exorcism in particular requires new attention among United Methodists, and among Christians more generally. I believe I talked a little bit about this in my post on The Exorcism of Emily Rose way back in September 2005 when I first started blogging. Maybe I should say before going further that I realize the word "exorcism" itself calls up a whole series of images - thanks in large part to Hollywood - that may or may not be helpful, and for this reason the language of spiritual "deliverance" may be more useful.

Now preparing this assigned paper I did not undertake lightly, but did much research, especially examining Anglican/Church of England sources (the 'Exeter Report' and related material I found to be especially useful), since they and the Roman Catholics are the only non-Pentecostal Churches that seem to have given this subject much serious attention during the 20th century.

So, I would like to open a conversation on this subject (that is not getting much treatment in blog-land at the moment, so far as I can tell). I think it is important to come to grips with the reality that Christians do believe in what the Nicene Creed calls "the unseen" elements of creation. Whether it is appropriate to call them "supernatural" is debatable, but they are in some sense beyond the material world (and therefore, most likely beyond the purview of the physical sciences). This is of course the reason why Modernity, as an intellectual perspective, taught us to be so skeptical about the unseen realities. But Modernity's hold upon our imaginations is waning, and we can now with fresh eyes look at these questions.

Of course, the reality of "spiritual forces of wickedness" (to quote the United Methodist baptismal liturgy) is quite plain in the Bible, as the numerous accounts of exorcism do demonstrate. In the ancient Church, because Paul equates idol worship with "communion with demons" in 1 Cor. 10, an exorcism was performed on all converts as part of the baptismal ritual (since they were all converting from Paganism). This exorcism actually still exists in our own United Methodist baptismal liturgy, as I have already noted, when the candidate for baptism is asked to reject the "spiritual forces of wickedness and evil powers of this world". So according to both the Bible, and the tradition as it has come to and been passed along by our Church, there are unseen spiritual powers and some of them are set against God and his people (therefore we call them "wicked").

Now I realize that very many people within my Church will nevertheless find this whole conversation to be absurd, even dangerous, because they do not believe in any sort of evil spirits. As I have said, I believe this in large part comes from an uncritical acceptance of certain tenets of Modernity's worldview that ought to be challenged. I am aware of some new interest in "powers and principalities" in mainline circles, however they often seem not to get to the point of admitting the reality of something like personal entities that occupy the unseen realm (rather talking more about 'systems' - though this may be a 'both-and' case). It might be profitable if some of us would ask ourselves "exactly why do I have trouble believing in this?"

I am reminded of a moment at General Conference at which point an African Methodist pastor stated that certain practices were inspired by the devil. The presiding bishop (an American) scolded him for such 'mud-slinging'/unfriendly language and seemed to totally miss the point that a theological claim had just been made, perhaps one that deserved to be examined rather than simply ridiculed and dismissed. (It is quite plain to me that, of course, General Conference is organized in such a fashion to make 'holy conferencing' - in the sense of deep and probing theological discussion - nearly impossible. Such issues will likely need to be explored through other venues).

The question naturally arises then, if these unseen realities (both God-serving and the wicked) do exist - what does this mean for our own spiritual lives? What interaction do we have - knowingly or (scary thought) unknowingly with these spiritual forces or beings? How should it affect the way we pray? All of these questions make me somewhat uncomfortable, and that is why I think I need to look into them a bit more.

As the writers I engaged pointed out, the language of "demonic oppression" is probably more helpful than "demonic possession." Demonic oppression runs a whole spectrum from simple temptation to the more extreme levels of oppression that have in the past been called "demon possession." This gets us past the fruitless question of whether a water-washed and Spirit-born Christian could be 'possessed' by a devil or not. Clearly, in this way of looking at things, all of us experience various levels of demonic oppression in our life as disciples, and should seek to be equipped to deal with it. We may have already done so without realizing it. (This does not mean, however, that anytime we are feeling tempted it therefore follows that we are being attacked by an evil spirit, since some temptations will simply come from within ourselves).

SO, I propose that The United Methodist Church - her bishops, pastors, and theologians (both lay and clergy, both formally and informally trained) ought to investigate these questions with all due seriousness so as to avoid the near total ignorance and discomfort that now holds sway on the one hand, and also to avoid any kind of paranoia or fanaticism that may come from being un-informed on the other hand (there is a disturbing tendency among some to see a demon under every rock and behind every tree; this is surely unhealthy and perhaps a clearer teaching might help bring clearer discernment on these matters). Perhaps a theological guidebook or pamphlet may be prepared by the General Board of Discipleship in connection with the Aldersgate Renewal Ministry? Perhaps it can even be included in the Book of Resolutions as has been done with similar guilde-line pamphlets.

Our own heritage within the Anglican Tradition will no doubt be especially instructive and appropriate for our use. In the Church of England, each diocese has a designated (and properly trained) exorcist who can be called upon to perform or coordinate any services of deliverance and spiritual healing that are found to be necessary, after due consultation with psychological professionals. The deliverance service is closely related to the healing services that are already becoming popular among United Methodists, thanks in large part to the Charismatic movement.

Just so this doesn't sound any more threatening than it already may for many readers, let me point you to some resources for prayer on this subect with which you may already be familiar:

1. The Lord's Prayer. Most of us pray it every week in the liturgy, and perhaps every day as well. The last petition is of course "but deliver us from evil." The NRSV has it in Matthew 6 as "but rescue us from the evil one" - a clear reference to the devil, the chief of these 'fallen angels' or evil spirits or whatever we want to call them. This is, as my Anglican sources pointed out, quite properly understood to be a 'minor' exorcism.

2. The baptismal vows (see The United Methodist Hymnal p. 34), as I've already mentioned, include elements of an exorcism. It involves the renunciation of demonic powers and then a profession of faith in Jesus as Lord and savior. Because "no one can say 'Jesus is Lord' but by the Spirit of God" (see 1 Cor. 12:3) the Early Church reasoned that once one had sincerely made these vows, then demonic influences could not at that moment have control over them (or they would not have been able to make the good confession). The language has been retained in Baptismal liturgies since the days of the Early Church.

3. The Great Litany in The Book of Common Prayer, 1979 (p. 148-155, a rather long prayer) contains some remarkable prayers for deliverance, including the very second petition:

"From all evil and wickedness; from sin; from the crafts and assaults of the devil; and from everlasting damnation, Good Lord, deliver us!"

4. Many traditional night-time prayers contain petitions for deliverance from spiritual darkness (see, for example #689 in The United Methodist Hymnal) including especially the prayer found in the Order for Compline (again, 1979 BCP) on p. 133:

"Visit this place, O Lord, and drive far from it all snares of the enemy; let your holy angels dwill with us to preserve us in peace; and let your blessing be upon us always; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen."

My research suggested that this prayer was also especially appropriated for claiming the reality of the Kingdom in and over places that had been particularly affected by evil spirits (in some instances, we might call them 'haunted' or otherwise 'dark' places, though clearly not all alleged hauntings would fall into this category).

5. The mention of Angels in that last prayer brings up the important point that there are also spiritual forces of goodness that are obedient to the will of God and are seeking to uphold and defend us in various ways. St. Michael the Archangel is viewed as chief among them as a sort of general of the heavenly armies. It is within that framework that the following prayer, popular in the Roman Catholic/Anglo-Catholic tradition, may be used profitably (wording slightly altered to be more congeneal to my Evangelical/Protestant sensibilities):

"May St. Michael the Archangel defend us in the day of battle; be our safeguard against the wickedness and snares of the devil. May God rebuke him, we humbly pray; and may the Prince of the heavenly host, by the power of God, thrust down to hell Satan and all wicked spirits, who wander through the world for the ruin of souls. Amen"

Now (with much trepidation) I would like to hear what others may think about these things. Has anyone else taken this further than me? Are there already pastors, bishops, and theologians looking into these issues? I saw that Ben Witherington III recommended a book on the subject called The Dark Sacrament, but I've not yet read it.

Starbucks recedes; local shops rejoice

Here is an interesting story. It seems that in a slowing economy where gas costs more than $4 a gallon, luxuriously over-priced cups of non-essential stimulants are one of the first cuts we make in our family budgets. I find it interesting that we were willing to pay so much more for coffee than for gas, considering we could make our own coffee (even buy our own paper-cups) for far less.

For many, Starbucks is a symbol of contemporary pop-culture (at least the culture of white professionals) and a place of comfort in the midst of a fast-paced world. For others it is the evil empire that has, in only a few years, driven vast numbers of quirky and beloved independent coffee shops to their graves. So the annoucement that Starbucks is closing hundreds of stores will no doubt recieve mixed reactions. Perhaps they had more than really made sense in someplaces any ways.

So what do you think? Is Starbucks' decline a personal and national tragedy, or a great moment of hope for the coffee-shop world? Or neither?

I can tell you that when I took the above picture in Oxford (UK), I thought "It's the end of Western Civilization!" But as I reflected later...I suppose it's possible that the space would have otherwise been vacant (though I don't remember seeing a single vacant storefront while there, so I doubt it).

Archbishop of Canterbury responds to GAFCON

Click here for his entire statement posted on the blog "Apostolicity." The very short version: Archbishop Williams also agrees that the 14 theological points in the Final Statement represent historic Anglicanism (and like me, he suspects some Anglicans might want to tweak points of emphasis).

The Archbishop's primary concerns are, not surprisingly, with the practical steps forward offered by GAFCON - the creation of a self-selecting council of Primates (major archbishops or leaders of national churches) and the continuation and expansion of cross-provincial church planting/administration (as with the Anglican Mission in American Churches that are under African bishops).

He says that a major goal of the upcoming Lambeth is to reaffirm the shared Anglican identity and to renew the structures of Communion and common discipline. The fear that Lambeth will not be allowed to address these issues in deep and meaningful (and decisive) ways has in part led to the large number of boycotts from conservative bishops. We'll see what really happens.